Preview:

SUPREME COURT OF ARIZONA En Banc CITY OF TUCSON, an Arizona municipal corporation, ) ) ) Plaintiff/Appellant, ) ) v. ) ) CLEAR CHANNEL OUTDOOR, INC, a ) Delaware corporation, ) ) Defendant/Appellee. ) ) __________________________________) Arizona Supreme Court No. CV-04-0033-PR Court of Appeals Division Two No. 2 CA-CV 02-0183 Pima County Superior Court No. C-20003722 O P I N I O N

Appeal from Pima County Superior Court The Honorable Charles V. Harrington, Judge The Honorable Carmine Cornelio, Judge VACATED AND REMANDED

Opinion of the Court of Appeals, Division Two 206 Ariz. 335, 78 P.3d 1056 (App. 2003) VACATED

PAUL G. ULRICH, P.C. By: Paul G. Ulrich and MICHAEL D. HOUSE, FORMER TUCSON CITY ATTORNEY MICHAEL G. RANKIN, TUCSON CITY ATTORNEY By: Frank William Kern, III and Dennis P. McLaughlin Attorneys for Plaintiff/Appellant City of Tucson

Phoenix

Tucson

MUNGER CHADWICK, P.L.C. Tucson By: John F. Munger and Evelyn Patrick Rick Attorneys for Defendant/Appellee Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc.

ARIZONA CENTER FOR LAW IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST By: Joy E. Herr-Cardillo Attorney for Amici Curiae Neighborhood Coalition of Greater Tucson, The Sierra Club, Grand Canyon Chapter, Neighborhood Coalition of Greater Phoenix, N.A.I.L.E.M., and Luz Social Services

Tucson

H U R W I T Z, Justice

Download CITY OF TUCSON v CLEAR CHANNEL OUTDOOR INC.pdf

Arizona Law