Brinker Restaurant Corp. v. Super. Ct. 10/12/07 CA4/1

State: California

Court: 1st District Court of Appeal 1st District Court of Appeal

Docket No: D049331

Case Date: 11/01/2007

Preview:Filed 10/12/07 Brinker Restaurant Corp. v. Superior Court CA4/1

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

COURT OF APPEAL - FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

BRINKER RESTAURANT CORPORATION et al., Petitioners, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, Respondent; ADAM HOHNBAUM et al., Real Parties in Interest.

D049331 (San Diego County Super. Ct. No. GIC834348)

Petition for writ of mandate after the superior court issued an order certifying a class. Patricia A.Y. Cowett, Judge. Petition granted with directions.

Plaintiffs and real parties in interest Adam Hohnbaum, Illya Haase, Romeo Osorio, Amanda June Rader and Santana Alvarado (collectively plaintiffs) sued defendants Brinker Restaurant Corporation, Brinker International, Inc., and Brinker

International Payroll Company, L.P. (collectively Brinker) on behalf of themselves and similarly situated current and former California hourly restaurant employees of Brinker (the proposed class), alleging that Brinker had violated numerous California wage and hour laws and California's unfair competition law (Bus. & Prof. Code,

Download Brinker Restaurant Corp. v. Super. Ct. 10/12/07 CA4/1.pdf