Cathedral City Redev. v. Stickles 12/19/05 CA4/2

State: California

Court: 1st District Court of Appeal 1st District Court of Appeal

Docket No: E036456

Case Date: 03/01/2006

Preview:Filed 12/19/05

CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION TWO

CATHEDRAL CITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, E036456 Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super.Ct.No. INC032826) v. OPINION SAM STICKLES, Individually and as Trustee, etc. et al., Defendants and Appellants.

APPEAL from the Superior Court of Riverside County. Christopher J. Sheldon, Judge. Affirmed. The Law Office of Martin Lax and Martin Lax for Defendants and Appellants. Oliver, Vose, Sandifer, Murphy & Lee and James Duff Murphy for Plaintiff and Respondent.

1

INTRODUCTION In this quick take eminent domain proceeding, defendants and appellants1 appeal from a judgment in favor of respondent, Cathedral City Redevelopment Agency (CCRA), condemning appellants' three residential rental properties for redevelopment purposes. We affirm the judgment. In quick take eminent domain proceedings, the date of valuation of the property, for purposes of trial on the issue of the property owner's just compensation, is statutorily required to be no later than the date the plaintiff makes a deposit of probable compensation. (Code of Civ. Proc.,

Download Cathedral City Redev. v. Stickles 12/19/05 CA4/2.pdf