Find Laws Find Lawyers Free Legal Forms USA State Laws
Laws-info.com » Cases » California » Court of Appeal » 2012 » City of San Diego v. Trustees of CA St. U 12/13/11 CA4/1
City of San Diego v. Trustees of CA St. U 12/13/11 CA4/1
State: California
Court: 1st District Court of Appeal 1st District Court of Appeal
Docket No: D057446
Case Date: 04/18/2012
Preview:Filed 12/13/11

CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION

COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

CITY OF SAN DIEGO et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, Defendant and Respondent.

D057446

(Super. Ct. Nos. GIC855643, GIC855701, 37-2007-00083692-CU-WM-CTL, 37-2007-00083773-CU-MC-CTL, 37-2007-00083768-CU-TT-CTL)

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County, Thomas P. Nugent, Judge. Affirmed in part, reversed in part and remanded with directions. Jan I. Goldsmith, City Attorney, Donald R. Worley, Assistant City Attorney, and Christine M. Leone, Chief Deputy City Attorney, for Plaintiffs and Appellants the City of San Diego and Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Diego. John F. Kirk; the Sohagi Law Group, Margaret M. Sohagi, Philip A. Seymour, and Nicole H. Gordon for Plaintiffs and Appellants San Diego Association of Governments and San Diego Metropolitan Transit System.

Ronald W. Beals, Thomas C. Fellenz, David H. McCray, Brandon S. Walker and Elizabeth R. Strayer for State of California, Department of Transportation as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Plaintiffs and Appellants. Remy, Thomas, Moose & Manley, Sabrina V. Teller and Laura M. Harris for League of California Cities and California State Association of Counties as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Plaintiffs and Appellants. Gatzke, Dillon & Ballance, Mark J. Dillon, Michael S. Haberkorn and Danielle K. Morone for Defendant and Respondent. In 2005, the Board of Trustees of the California State University (CSU) certified an environmental impact report (EIR) and approved a project for the expansion of San Diego State University (SDSU). The project included the construction of new buildings and an increase in SDSU's student enrollment from 25,000 full-time equivalent students (FTES) to 35,000 FTES by the 2024/2025 academic year. During the pendency of litigation challenging the 2005 EIR certification and project approval, the California Supreme Court issued its opinion in City of Marina v. Board of Trustees of California State University (2006) 39 Cal.4th 341 (Marina), which addressed certain issues involved in the 2005 SDSU EIR litigation. In response to Marina, the trial court in 2006 entered judgment against CSU and issued a writ of mandate directing it to set aside its certification of the 2005 EIR and approval of the SDSU expansion project. The court retained jurisdiction of the matter until it determined CSU had complied with the

2

California Environmental Quality Act (Pub. Resources Code,
Download City of San Diego v. Trustees of CA St. U 12/13/11 CA4/1.pdf

California Law

CALIFORNIA STATE LAWS
    > California Code
CALIFORNIA STATE
    > California Budget
    > California Counties
    > California Zip Codes
CALIFORNIA TAX
    > California Sales Tax
CALIFORNIA LABOR LAWS
    > California Jobs
CALIFORNIA COURT
    > California Rules Of Court
    > Small Claims Court - California
CALIFORNIA AGENCIES

Comments

Tips