In re Joey V. 3/15/12 CA5

State: California

Court: 1st District Court of Appeal 1st District Court of Appeal

Docket No: F062051

Case Date: 06/13/2012

Preview:Filed 3/15/12 In re Joey V. CA5

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT In re JOEY V., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law. THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. F062051 (Super. Ct. No. 09CEJ601172-1V5)

OPINION
JOEY V., Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Fresno County. David A. Gottlieb, Judge. Johanna R. Pirko, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant. Kamala D. Harris, Attorney General, Dane R. Gillette, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Michael P. Farrell, Assistant Attorney General, Charles A. French and Jeffrey D. Firestone, Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Respondent. -ooOoo-

Joey V. is a ward of the juvenile court, having committed acts that would be crimes if committed by an adult. After a series of probation violations, he was removed from his parents' custody and placed at a juvenile detention center pending a foster care placement. He argues now that his case must be remanded to the juvenile court because the court, although notified that he possibly is an Indian child, did not comply with the inquiry and notice requirements of the Indian Child Welfare Act (25 U.S.C.

Download In re Joey V. 3/15/12 CA5.pdf