Miklosy v. UC Regents 10/27/05 CA1/4

State: California

Court: 1st District Court of Appeal 1st District Court of Appeal

Docket No: A107711

Case Date: 01/04/2006

Preview:Filed 10/27/05 Miklosy v. Regents of the Univ. of Cal. CA1/4

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FOUR

LES G. MIKLOSY et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. THE REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA et al., Defendants and Respondents. The trial court sustained the demurrer of respondents the Regents of the University of California, Kim Minuzzo, Larry Lagin and Jerry Krammen to a wrongful termination action filed by two former employees, appellants Les G. Miklosy and Luciana C. Messina. Miklosy and Messina appeal the resulting judgment of dismissal, contending that the trial court erred in sustaining the Regents' demurrer to their first amended complaint because that pleading stated causes of action for wrongful termination in retaliation for whistleblowing, wrongful termination in violation of public policy, and intentional infliction of emotional distress. They also contend that the individual defendants named in their first amended complaint are liable for wrongful termination in violation of public policy. (See Gov. Code,1

Download Miklosy v. UC Regents 10/27/05 CA1/4.pdf