P. v. George 7/19/05 CA6

State: California

Court: 1st District Court of Appeal 1st District Court of Appeal

Docket No: H027709

Case Date: 11/02/2005

Preview:Filed 7/19/05 P. v. George CA6

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS
California Rules of Court, rule 977(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 977(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 977.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. WILLIE JAMES GEORGE, Defendant and Appellant.

H027709 (Santa Clara County Super. Ct. No. CC311259)

In the court below, defendant Willie James George unsuccessfully moved to suppress evidence. He thereafter pleaded guilty to attempting to use a counterfeit access card, second degree burglary, possession of a forged driver's license, and forgery of access-card-account information. On appeal, he contends that the trial court erred by denying his suppression motion. He principally argues that the evidence implicating him was the product of an unlawful detention or involuntary consent. We affirm the judgment. SCOPE OF REVIEW " ` "An appellate court's review of a trial court's ruling on a motion to suppress is governed by well-settled principles. [Citation.] [

Download P. v. George 7/19/05 CA6.pdf