P. v. Super. Ct. (Humberto S.) 12/20/06 CA2/7

State: California

Court: 1st District Court of Appeal 1st District Court of Appeal

Docket No: B193386N

Case Date: 03/21/2007

Preview:Filed 12/20/06

CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION SEVEN

THE PEOPLE, Petitioner, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY, Respondent; HUMBERTO S., Real Party in Interest.

No. B193386 (Super. Ct. No. TJ15419) ORDER MODIFYING OPINION NO CHANGE IN JUDGMENT

THE COURT: It is ordered that the opinion filed herein on November 22, 2006, be modified as follows: 1. On page 5, the last line before section entitled "DISCUSSION", add the

following footnote: "The District Attorney's office filed a petition for rehearing in this Court asserting, among other arguments, that the disqualification order was overly broad because it will result in the recusal of over 100 prosecutors. The ________________________________________________________________________ JOHNSON, Acting P. J. WOODS, J. ZELON, J

record before this court contains no evidence that supports that assertion." 2. On page 9, first full paragraph, third line from the end, delete the word

"so", so the sentence reads "one-sided in favor of the prosecution and victims" . . . . There is no change in the judgment. Petitioner's petition for rehearing is denied.

2

Download P. v. Super. Ct. (Humberto S.) 12/20/06 CA2/7.pdf