Preview:

****************************************************** The ``officially released'' date that appears near the beginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be published in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the beginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the ``officially released'' date appearing in the opinion. In no event will any such motions be accepted before the ``officially released'' date. All opinions are subject to modification and technical correction prior to official publication in the Connecticut Reports and Connecticut Appellate Reports. In the event of discrepancies between the electronic version of an opinion and the print version appearing in the Connecticut Law Journal and subsequently in the Connecticut Reports or Connecticut Appellate Reports, the latest print version is to be considered authoritative. The syllabus and procedural history accompanying the opinion as it appears on the Commission on Official Legal Publications Electronic Bulletin Board Service and in the Connecticut Law Journal and bound volumes of official reports are copyrighted by the Secretary of the State, State of Connecticut, and may not be reproduced and distributed without the express written permission of the Commission on Official Legal Publications, Judicial Branch, State of Connecticut. ****************************************************** ADMINISTRATOR, UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION ACT ET AL. v. WILLIAM F. MOFFETT ET AL. (AC 19549)
Lavery, C. J., and Foti and Peters, Js. Submitted on briefs September 26--officially released November 14, 2000 Counsel

Richard T. Sponzo, assistant attorney general, Richard Blumenthal, attorney general, and Jane S. Scholl, associate attorney general, filed a brief for the appellant (intervening defendant employment security appeals division board of review). Thadd A. Gnocchi, assistant attorney general, Richard Blumenthal, attorney general, and Charles A. Overend, assistant attorney general, filed a brief for the appellee (plaintiff administrator, Unemployment Compensation Act).
Opinion

PER CURIAM. The intervening defendant employment security appeals division board of review (board) appeals from the judgment of the trial court rendered in favor of the plaintiff administrator, Unemployment

Compensation Act (administrator).1 The board claims that the court improperly ruled that pursuant to General Statutes

Download Administrator, Unemployment Compensation Act v. Moffett.pdf

Connecticut Law