Find Laws Find Lawyers Free Legal Forms USA State Laws
Laws-info.com » Cases » Connecticut » Supreme Court » 1969 » Autotote Enterprises, Inc. v. State
Autotote Enterprises, Inc. v. State
State: Connecticut
Court: Supreme Court
Docket No: SC17299
Case Date: 12/31/1969
Preview:****************************************************** The ``officially released'' date that appears near the beginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be published in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the beginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the ``officially released'' date appearing in the opinion. In no event will any such motions be accepted before the ``officially released'' date. All opinions are subject to modification and technical correction prior to official publication in the Connecticut Reports and Connecticut Appellate Reports. In the event of discrepancies between the electronic version of an opinion and the print version appearing in the Connecticut Law Journal and subsequently in the Connecticut Reports or Connecticut Appellate Reports, the latest print version is to be considered authoritative. The syllabus and procedural history accompanying the opinion as it appears on the Commission on Official Legal Publications Electronic Bulletin Board Service and in the Connecticut Law Journal and bound volumes of official reports are copyrighted by the Secretary of the State, State of Connecticut, and may not be reproduced and distributed without the express written permission of the Commission on Official Legal Publications, Judicial Branch, State of Connecticut. ******************************************************

AUTOTOTE ENTERPRISES, INC. v. STATE OF CONNECTICUT, DIVISION OF SPECIAL REVENUE (SC 17299)
Sullivan, C. J., and Norcott, Palmer, Vertefeuille and Zarella, Js.* Argued October 27, 2005--officially released May 9, 2006

Robert F. Vacchelli, assistant attorney general, with whom, on the brief, was Richard Blumenthal, attorney general, for the appellant (defendant). Robert D. Tobin, with whom was F. Jerome O'Malley, for the appellee (plaintiff).
Opinion

ZARELLA, J. The sole issue in this appeal is whether the moratorium on the expansion of off-track betting facilities imposed by General Statutes
Download Autotote Enterprises, Inc. v. State.pdf

Connecticut Law

Connecticut State Laws
Connecticut Court
Connecticut Agencies
    > Connecticut DMV

Comments

Tips