Preview:

****************************************************** The ``officially released'' date that appears near the beginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be published in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the beginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the ``officially released'' date appearing in the opinion. In no event will any such motions be accepted before the ``officially released'' date. All opinions are subject to modification and technical correction prior to official publication in the Connecticut Reports and Connecticut Appellate Reports. In the event of discrepancies between the electronic version of an opinion and the print version appearing in the Connecticut Law Journal and subsequently in the Connecticut Reports or Connecticut Appellate Reports, the latest print version is to be considered authoritative. The syllabus and procedural history accompanying the opinion as it appears on the Commission on Official Legal Publications Electronic Bulletin Board Service and in the Connecticut Law Journal and bound volumes of official reports are copyrighted by the Secretary of the State, State of Connecticut, and may not be reproduced and distributed without the express written permission of the Commission on Official Legal Publications, Judicial Branch, State of Connecticut. ******************************************************

PETRAQ BODE v. CONNECTICUT MASON CONTRACTORS, THE LEARNING CORRIDOR ET AL. (AC 32086)
Lavine, Alvord and McDonald, Js. Argued March 17--officially released August 16, 2011

(Appeal from workers' compensation review board.) Petraq Bode, pro se, the appellant (plaintiff). Angelo Cicchiello and Jonathan A. Cantor submitted a brief on behalf of the appellant (plaintiff). Heather Porto, with whom, on the brief, was James

L. Pomeranz, for the appellees (defendants).

Opinion

ALVORD, J. The plaintiff, Petraq Bode, appeals from the decision of the workers' compensation review board (board) affirming the determination by the workers' compensation commissioner for the fifth district (commissioner) that he was not entitled to benefits pursuant to General Statutes

Download Bode v. Connecticut Mason Contractors, The Learning Corridor.pdf

Connecticut Law