Find Laws Find Lawyers Free Legal Forms USA State Laws
Laws-info.com » Cases » Connecticut » Supreme Court » 2012 » Brown & Brown, Inc. v. Blumenthal
Brown & Brown, Inc. v. Blumenthal
State: Connecticut
Court: Supreme Court
Docket No: SC17920
Case Date: 09/09/2012
Preview:****************************************************** The ``officially released'' date that appears near the beginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be published in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the beginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the ``officially released'' date appearing in the opinion. In no event will any such motions be accepted before the ``officially released'' date. All opinions are subject to modification and technical correction prior to official publication in the Connecticut Reports and Connecticut Appellate Reports. In the event of discrepancies between the electronic version of an opinion and the print version appearing in the Connecticut Law Journal and subsequently in the Connecticut Reports or Connecticut Appellate Reports, the latest print version is to be considered authoritative. The syllabus and procedural history accompanying the opinion as it appears on the Commission on Official Legal Publications Electronic Bulletin Board Service and in the Connecticut Law Journal and bound volumes of official reports are copyrighted by the Secretary of the State, State of Connecticut, and may not be reproduced and distributed without the express written permission of the Commission on Official Legal Publications, Judicial Branch, State of Connecticut. ******************************************************

BROWN AND BROWN, INC. v. RICHARD BLUMENTHAL, ATTORNEY GENERAL RICHARD BLUMENTHAL, ATTORNEY GENERAL v. BROWN AND BROWN, INC. (SC 17920)
Rogers, C. J., and Palmer, Vertefeuille, Zarella and Schaller, Js. Argued February 15--officially released September 9, 2008

Michelle H. Seagull, with whom were William M. Rubenstein and Kelly A. Burns, for the appellant (plaintiff in the first case, defendant in the second case). Matthew J. Budzik, assistant attorney general, with whom were Arnold B. Feigin, assistant attorney general, and, on the brief, Michael E. Cole, chief of the antitrust department, for the appellee (defendant in the first case, plaintiff in the second case). James Sicilian, Jason S. Weathers, Ben Robbins, Martin J. Newhouse and Jo Ann Shotwell Kaplan filed a brief for the New England Legal Foundation as amicus curiae. Dennis F. Kerrigan, Jr., Michael Menapace and Emily A. Gianquinto filed a brief for the Connecticut Business and Industry Association, Inc., et al., as amici curiae.

Opinion

VERTEFEUILLE, J. This appeal arises from an action seeking injunctive, declaratory and equitable relief brought by the plaintiff, Brown and Brown, Inc., against the defendant, Attorney General Richard Blumenthal, in connection with a subpoena duces tecum and interrogatories issued by the defendant pursuant to General Statutes
Download Brown & Brown, Inc. v. Blumenthal.pdf

Connecticut Law

Connecticut State Laws
Connecticut Court
Connecticut Agencies
    > Connecticut DMV

Comments

Tips