Preview:

****************************************************** The ``officially released'' date that appears near the beginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be published in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the beginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the ``officially released'' date appearing in the opinion. In no event will any such motions be accepted before the ``officially released'' date. All opinions are subject to modification and technical correction prior to official publication in the Connecticut Reports and Connecticut Appellate Reports. In the event of discrepancies between the electronic version of an opinion and the print version appearing in the Connecticut Law Journal and subsequently in the Connecticut Reports or Connecticut Appellate Reports, the latest print version is to be considered authoritative. The syllabus and procedural history accompanying the opinion as it appears on the Commission on Official Legal Publications Electronic Bulletin Board Service and in the Connecticut Law Journal and bound volumes of official reports are copyrighted by the Secretary of the State, State of Connecticut, and may not be reproduced and distributed without the express written permission of the Commission on Official Legal Publications, Judicial Branch, State of Connecticut. ******************************************************

COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION ET AL. v. FREEDOM OF INFORMATION COMMISSION ET AL. COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTION v. FREEDOM OF INFORMATION COMMISSION ET AL. (AC 32409)
Gruendel, Robinson and Alvord, Js. Argued April 26--officially released June 14, 2011

(Appeal from Superior Court, judicial district of New Britain, Cohn, J.) David P. Taylor, pro se, the appellant (defendant). Steven R. Strom, assistant attorney general, with whom were George Jepson, attorney general, and, on the brief, Gregory T. D'Auria, senior appellate counsel, and Michael K. Skold, assistant attorney general, for the appellee (named plaintiff).

Opinion

PER CURIAM. The defendant David P. Taylor appeals from the judgments of the Superior Court sustaining the appeals of the plaintiffs, the commissioner of correction, Steven Petracca, Harry Soucy and AFSCME, Council 4, Local 387, from the decisions of the defendant freedom of information commission (commission)1 and prohibiting the disclosure of certain disciplinary records of department of correction (department) employees pursuant to General Statutes

Download Commissioner of Correction v. Freedom of Information Commission.pdf

Connecticut Law