Preview:

****************************************************** The ``officially released'' date that appears near the beginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be published in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the beginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the ``officially released'' date appearing in the opinion. In no event will any such motions be accepted before the ``officially released'' date. All opinions are subject to modification and technical correction prior to official publication in the Connecticut Reports and Connecticut Appellate Reports. In the event of discrepancies between the electronic version of an opinion and the print version appearing in the Connecticut Law Journal and subsequently in the Connecticut Reports or Connecticut Appellate Reports, the latest print version is to be considered authoritative. The syllabus and procedural history accompanying the opinion as it appears on the Commission on Official Legal Publications Electronic Bulletin Board Service and in the Connecticut Law Journal and bound volumes of official reports are copyrighted by the Secretary of the State, State of Connecticut, and may not be reproduced and distributed without the express written permission of the Commission on Official Legal Publications, Judicial Branch, State of Connecticut. ******************************************************

MARCIA IELLO v. MICHAEL WEINER ET AL. (AC 32345)
DiPentima, C. J., and Gruendel and Beach, Js. Argued April 12--officially released June 7, 2011

(Appeal from Superior Court, judicial district of Fairfield, Levin, J.) David H. Johnson, for the appellant (plaintiff). Beverly S. Knapp, for the appelle (named defendant).

Opinion

GRUENDEL, J. The plaintiff, Marcia Iello, appeals from the summary judgment rendered by the trial court in favor of the defendant Michael Weiner.1 On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the court improperly concluded that her action was time barred by the applicable statute of limitations2 and could not be saved under General Statutes

Download Iello v. Weiner.pdf

Connecticut Law