Preview:

****************************************************** The ``officially released'' date that appears near the beginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be published in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the beginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the ``officially released'' date appearing in the opinion. In no event will any such motions be accepted before the ``officially released'' date. All opinions are subject to modification and technical correction prior to official publication in the Connecticut Reports and Connecticut Appellate Reports. In the event of discrepancies between the electronic version of an opinion and the print version appearing in the Connecticut Law Journal and subsequently in the Connecticut Reports or Connecticut Appellate Reports, the latest print version is to be considered authoritative. The syllabus and procedural history accompanying the opinion as it appears on the Commission on Official Legal Publications Electronic Bulletin Board Service and in the Connecticut Law Journal and bound volumes of official reports are copyrighted by the Secretary of the State, State of Connecticut, and may not be reproduced and distributed without the express written permission of the Commission on Official Legal Publications, Judicial Branch, State of Connecticut. ******************************************************

LYNN LOPA v. BRINKER INTERNATIONAL, INC., ET AL. (SC 18303)
Rogers, C. J., and Norcott, Katz, Palmer, Vertefeuille, Zarella and McLachlan, Js. Argued January 7--officially released May 25, 2010

Matthew E. Dodd, for the appellant (plaintiff). Yinxia Long, assistant attorney general, with whom, on the brief, were J. Sarah Posner, assistant attorney general, Richard Blumenthal, attorney general, and Thomas P. Clifford III, assistant attorney general, for the appellee (defendant second injury fund).

Opinion

McLACHLAN, J. The sole question presented in this certified appeal is whether the United States Postal Service (postal service) is an employer for purposes of the workers' compensation act (act), General Statutes

Download Lopa v. Brinker International, Inc..pdf

Connecticut Law