Preview:

****************************************************** The ``officially released'' date that appears near the beginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be published in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the beginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the ``officially released'' date appearing in the opinion. In no event will any such motions be accepted before the ``officially released'' date. All opinions are subject to modification and technical correction prior to official publication in the Connecticut Reports and Connecticut Appellate Reports. In the event of discrepancies between the electronic version of an opinion and the print version appearing in the Connecticut Law Journal and subsequently in the Connecticut Reports or Connecticut Appellate Reports, the latest print version is to be considered authoritative. The syllabus and procedural history accompanying the opinion as it appears on the Commission on Official Legal Publications Electronic Bulletin Board Service and in the Connecticut Law Journal and bound volumes of official reports are copyrighted by the Secretary of the State, State of Connecticut, and may not be reproduced and distributed without the express written permission of the Commission on Official Legal Publications, Judicial Branch, State of Connecticut. ******************************************************

LORD FAMILY OF WINDSOR, LLC, ET AL. v. INLAND WETLANDS AND WATERCOURSES COMMISSION OF THE TOWN OF WINDSOR ET AL. (SC 17989)
Rogers, C. J., and Norcott, Katz, Palmer and Zarella, Js. Argued March 20--officially released September 9, 2008

Richard A. Vassallo, for the appellant (named defendant). Michael A. Zizka, for the appellees (plaintiffs).

Opinion

PER CURIAM. The plaintiffs, Lord Family of Windsor, LLC, and Robert Daddario, appealed to the trial court from the decision of the named defendant, the inland wetlands and watercourses commission of the town of Windsor (commission),1 denying the plaintiffs' application to amend a regulated activities permit. The trial court rendered judgment for the commission, and the plaintiffs appealed to the Appellate Court, which reversed the judgment of the trial court upon concluding that the commission's decision was not supported by substantial evidence. Lord Family of Windsor, LLC v. Inlands Wetlands & Watercourses Commission, 103 Conn. App. 354, 364

Download Lord Family of Windsor, LLC v. Inland Wetlands & Watercourses Commission.pdf

Connecticut Law