Find Laws Find Lawyers Free Legal Forms USA State Laws
Laws-info.com » Cases » Connecticut » Supreme Court » 2010 » Remillard v. Remillard
Remillard v. Remillard
State: Connecticut
Court: Supreme Court
Docket No: SC18485
Case Date: 07/20/2010
Preview:****************************************************** The ``officially released'' date that appears near the beginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be published in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the beginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the ``officially released'' date appearing in the opinion. In no event will any such motions be accepted before the ``officially released'' date. All opinions are subject to modification and technical correction prior to official publication in the Connecticut Reports and Connecticut Appellate Reports. In the event of discrepancies between the electronic version of an opinion and the print version appearing in the Connecticut Law Journal and subsequently in the Connecticut Reports or Connecticut Appellate Reports, the latest print version is to be considered authoritative. The syllabus and procedural history accompanying the opinion as it appears on the Commission on Official Legal Publications Electronic Bulletin Board Service and in the Connecticut Law Journal and bound volumes of official reports are copyrighted by the Secretary of the State, State of Connecticut, and may not be reproduced and distributed without the express written permission of the Commission on Official Legal Publications, Judicial Branch, State of Connecticut. ******************************************************

SHARON REMILLARD v. BRADFORD REMILLARD (SC 18485)
Rogers, C. J., and Norcott, Katz, Palmer and Zarella, Js. Argued March 17--officially released July 13, 2010

Susan King Shaw, for the appellant (plaintiff). Karen E. Haley, for the appellee (defendant).

Opinion

ZARELLA, J. The plaintiff, Sharon Remillard, appeals1 from the trial court's denial of her postdissolution motion to terminate her obligation to pay alimony to the defendant, Bradford Remillard, on the basis of the defendant's cohabitation with an unrelated female. The plaintiff claims that the trial court improperly (1) failed to apply the criteria set forth in General Statutes
Download Remillard v. Remillard.pdf

Connecticut Law

Connecticut State Laws
Connecticut Court
Connecticut Agencies
    > Connecticut DMV

Comments

Tips