Preview:

****************************************************** The ``officially released'' date that appears near the beginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be published in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the beginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the ``officially released'' date appearing in the opinion. In no event will any such motions be accepted before the ``officially released'' date. All opinions are subject to modification and technical correction prior to official publication in the Connecticut Reports and Connecticut Appellate Reports. In the event of discrepancies between the electronic version of an opinion and the print version appearing in the Connecticut Law Journal and subsequently in the Connecticut Reports or Connecticut Appellate Reports, the latest print version is to be considered authoritative. The syllabus and procedural history accompanying the opinion as it appears on the Commission on Official Legal Publications Electronic Bulletin Board Service and in the Connecticut Law Journal and bound volumes of official reports are copyrighted by the Secretary of the State, State of Connecticut, and may not be reproduced and distributed without the express written permission of the Commission on Official Legal Publications, Judicial Branch, State of Connecticut. ****************************************************** PETER RUSTICI ET AL. v. DANNEL MALLOY ET AL. (AC 18509)
Schaller, Spear and Pellegrino, Js. Argued May 10--officially released September 19, 2000 Counsel

Kenneth B. Povodator, assistant corporation counsel, with whom, on the brief, was Andrew J. McDonald, corporation counsel, for the appellants (named defendant et al.). Leon M. Rosenblatt, with whom, on the brief, was David S. Rintoul, for the appellees (plaintiffs).
Opinion

SCHALLER, J. The defendants, Dannel Malloy, John Byrne, James Haselkamp and the city of Stamford, appeal from the trial court's order granting the plaintiffs'1 motion for a temporary injunction that prohibited the city from continuing to maintain a fire engine team at one of the volunteer fire stations in the Long Ridge section of the city.2 On appeal, as a preliminary matter, the defendants claim that the temporary injunction is an appealable final judgment, pursuant to General Statutes

Download Rustici v. Malloy.pdf

Connecticut Law