Find Laws Find Lawyers Free Legal Forms USA State Laws
Laws-info.com » Cases » Connecticut » Appellate Court » 1969 » Santorso v. Bristol Hospital
Santorso v. Bristol Hospital
State: Connecticut
Court: Court of Appeals
Docket No: AC32136
Case Date: 12/31/1969
Preview:****************************************************** The ``officially released'' date that appears near the beginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be published in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the beginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the ``officially released'' date appearing in the opinion. In no event will any such motions be accepted before the ``officially released'' date. All opinions are subject to modification and technical correction prior to official publication in the Connecticut Reports and Connecticut Appellate Reports. In the event of discrepancies between the electronic version of an opinion and the print version appearing in the Connecticut Law Journal and subsequently in the Connecticut Reports or Connecticut Appellate Reports, the latest print version is to be considered authoritative. The syllabus and procedural history accompanying the opinion as it appears on the Commission on Official Legal Publications Electronic Bulletin Board Service and in the Connecticut Law Journal and bound volumes of official reports are copyrighted by the Secretary of the State, State of Connecticut, and may not be reproduced and distributed without the express written permission of the Commission on Official Legal Publications, Judicial Branch, State of Connecticut. ******************************************************

PATRICIA SANTORSO, ADMINISTRATRIX (ESTATE OF LAWRENCE SANTORSO) ET AL. v. BRISTOL HOSPITAL ET AL. (AC 32136)
Lavine, Alvord and Borden, Js. Argued December 1, 2010--officially released April 5, 2011

(Appeal from Superior Court, judicial district of New Britain, Hon. Joseph M. Shortall, judge trial referee.) Michael G. Rigg, with whom was Nancy P. Tyler, for the appellant (defendant Bristol Hospital). Jason T. Prueher, for the appellant (defendant Jeffrey Goldberg). Lorinda S. Coon, for the appellant (defendant Rainer Bagdasarian).

Bruce E. Newman, for the appellee (plaintiff).

Opinion

LAVINE, J. The defendants, Bristol Hospital (hospital) and physicians Jeffrey Goldberg and Rainer Bagdasarian, appeal from the denial of their motions for summary judgment1 in this medical malpractice action. They claim that the trial court, Hon. Joseph M. Shortall, judge trial referee, improperly denied their motions for summary judgment rejecting their claim that the action is barred by the doctrine of res judicata. We agree and therefore reverse the judgment of the trial court. The following procedural history is relevant to our resolution of this appeal. On June 1, 2006, Lawrence Santorso (Santorso), the now deceased spouse of the plaintiff, Patricia Santorso, administratrix of the estate of Lawrence Santorso, commenced an action against the defendants in Santorso v. Bristol Hospital, Superior Court, judicial district of New Britain, Docket No. CV06-5001663-S (first action). The complaint in the first action alleged, in part, that the defendants were negligent in that, for two years, they failed to treat Santorso for a lesion in his lung that had been detected by the hospital's radiology department on three separate occasions. By the time Santorso was diagnosed with lung cancer, the cancer had metastasized, and he was not a candidate for surgical intervention. He died while the first action was pending. When the complaint in the first action was served on the defendants, it contained neither an attorney's good faith certificate nor opinion letters of similar health care providers (opinion letters), both required by General Statutes
Download Santorso v. Bristol Hospital.pdf

Connecticut Law

Connecticut State Laws
Connecticut Court
Connecticut Agencies
    > Connecticut DMV

Comments

Tips