Find Laws Find Lawyers Free Legal Forms USA State Laws
Laws-info.com » Cases » Connecticut » Supreme Court » 2003 » SC16673 - St. George v. Gordon
SC16673 - St. George v. Gordon
State: Connecticut
Court: Supreme Court
Docket No: 264cr93
Case Date: 07/01/2003
Plaintiff: SC16673 - St. George
Defendant: Gordon
Preview:****************************************************** The ``officially released'' date that appears near the beginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be published in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the beginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the ``officially released'' date appearing in the opinion. In no event will any such motions be accepted before the ``officially released'' date. All opinions are subject to modification and technical correction prior to official publication in the Connecticut Reports and Connecticut Appellate Reports. In the event of discrepancies between the electronic version of an opinion and the print version appearing in the Connecticut Law Journal and subsequently in the Connecticut Reports or Connecticut Appellate Reports, the latest print version is to be considered authoritative. The syllabus and procedural history accompanying the opinion as it appears on the Commission on Official Legal Publications Electronic Bulletin Board Service and in the Connecticut Law Journal and bound volumes of official reports are copyrighted by the Secretary of the State, State of Connecticut, and may not be reproduced and distributed without the express written permission of the Commission on Official Legal Publications, Judicial Branch, State of Connecticut. ******************************************************

ANN ST. GEORGE ET AL. v. ABRAHAM I. GORDON, EXECUTOR (ESTATE OF EDWIN MAK), ET AL. (SC 16673)
Sullivan, C. J., and Borden, Norcott, Katz and Vertefeuille, Js. Argued January 10--officially released July 1, 2003

Anthony F. Slez, Jr., for the appellants (plaintiffs). Ronald D. Japha, for the appellant (named defendant). Gregory T. D'Auria, associate attorney general, with whom were Eliot D. Prescott, assistant attorney general, and, on the brief, Richard Blumenthal, attorney general, and Jane R. Rosenberg, assistant attorney general, for the appellees (defendant Nancy Wyman et al.).

Opinion

VERTEFEUILLE, J. The plaintiffs and the named defendant, Abraham I. Gordon, executor of the estate of Edwin Mak,1 jointly appeal from the judgment of the trial court dismissing the plaintiffs' complaint and Gordon's cross claim in this action for indemnification brought pursuant to General Statutes
Download 264cr93.pdf

Connecticut Law

Connecticut State Laws
Connecticut Court
Connecticut Agencies
    > Connecticut DMV

Comments

Tips