Find Laws Find Lawyers Free Legal Forms USA State Laws
Laws-info.com » Cases » Connecticut » Supreme Court » 2004 » SC17021 Dissent - State v. Sinvil
SC17021 Dissent - State v. Sinvil
State: Connecticut
Court: Supreme Court
Docket No: 270CR122E
Case Date: 08/10/2004
Plaintiff: SC17021 Dissent - State
Defendant: Sinvil
Preview:****************************************************** The ``officially released'' date that appears near the beginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be published in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the beginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the ``officially released'' date appearing in the opinion. In no event will any such motions be accepted before the ``officially released'' date. All opinions are subject to modification and technical correction prior to official publication in the Connecticut Reports and Connecticut Appellate Reports. In the event of discrepancies between the electronic version of an opinion and the print version appearing in the Connecticut Law Journal and subsequently in the Connecticut Reports or Connecticut Appellate Reports, the latest print version is to be considered authoritative. The syllabus and procedural history accompanying the opinion as it appears on the Commission on Official Legal Publications Electronic Bulletin Board Service and in the Connecticut Law Journal and bound volumes of official reports are copyrighted by the Secretary of the State, State of Connecticut, and may not be reproduced and distributed without the express written permission of the Commission on Official Legal Publications, Judicial Branch, State of Connecticut. ******************************************************

STATE V. SINVIL--DISSENT

SULLIVAN, C. J., dissenting. I respectfully dissent from the majority opinion because I agree with the Appellate Court's conclusion that the defendant was deprived of his due process right to a fair trial, as protected by the federal constitution, as a result of the prosecutor's improper ``attempt to affect the jury's decision by arguing facts not in evidence, namely, his own physical condition or the questions that he should have asked [and did not].'' State v. Sinvil, 76 Conn. App. 761, 771, 821 A.2d 813 (2003).

Download 270CR122E.pdf

Connecticut Law

Connecticut State Laws
Connecticut Court
Connecticut Agencies
    > Connecticut DMV

Comments

Tips