Find Laws Find Lawyers Free Legal Forms USA State Laws
Laws-info.com » Cases » Connecticut » Supreme Court » 2012 » TES Franchising, LLC v. Feldman
TES Franchising, LLC v. Feldman
State: Connecticut
Court: Supreme Court
Docket No: SC17867
Case Date: 03/25/2012
Preview:****************************************************** The ``officially released'' date that appears near the beginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be published in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the beginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the ``officially released'' date appearing in the opinion. In no event will any such motions be accepted before the ``officially released'' date. All opinions are subject to modification and technical correction prior to official publication in the Connecticut Reports and Connecticut Appellate Reports. In the event of discrepancies between the electronic version of an opinion and the print version appearing in the Connecticut Law Journal and subsequently in the Connecticut Reports or Connecticut Appellate Reports, the latest print version is to be considered authoritative. The syllabus and procedural history accompanying the opinion as it appears on the Commission on Official Legal Publications Electronic Bulletin Board Service and in the Connecticut Law Journal and bound volumes of official reports are copyrighted by the Secretary of the State, State of Connecticut, and may not be reproduced and distributed without the express written permission of the Commission on Official Legal Publications, Judicial Branch, State of Connecticut. ******************************************************

TES FRANCHISING, LLC v. RICHARD FELDMAN (SC 17867)
Rogers, C. J., and Norcott, Katz, Zarella and Schaller, Js. Argued October 15, 2007--officially released March 25, 2008

Charles D. Ray, with whom were Vanessa D. Roberts and Mario G. Ceste, for the appellant (defendant).

Scott C. Kern, with whom, on the brief, was Janine Hodgson, for the appellee (plaintiff).

Opinion

ROGERS, C. J. This appeal addresses issues arising from a trial court's determination of probable cause in granting a prejudgment remedy. The defendant, Richard Feldman, appeals from the trial court's order granting a prejudgment remedy in favor of the plaintiff, TES Franchising, LLC, upon a finding of probable cause that the defendant had breached a settlement agreement by disclosing confidential information and making disparaging remarks about the plaintiff. On appeal, the defendant claims that the trial court, Lopez, J., improperly: (1) granted the prejudgment remedy because the trial court's memorandum of decision does not address adequately the defendant's defenses and counterclaims as required by General Statutes
Download TES Franchising, LLC v. Feldman.pdf

Connecticut Law

Connecticut State Laws
Connecticut Court
Connecticut Agencies
    > Connecticut DMV

Comments

Tips