02-1922 GONZALEZ V. GONZALEZ

State: Florida

Court: Florida Southern District Court

Docket No: 3d02-1922

Case Date: 12/23/2002

Plaintiff: 02-1922 GONZALEZ

Defendant: GONZALEZ

Preview:NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DISPOSED OF.

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA THIRD DISTRICT JULY TERM, A.D. 2002

MARIO GONZALEZ, Appellant, vs. AURORA GONZALEZ, Appellee.

** ** ** ** ** LOWER TRIBUNAL NO. 01-26815 CASE NO. 3D02-1922

Opinion filed December 23, 2002. An appeal from a non-final order from the Circuit Court for Dade County, Marc Schumacher, Judge. Perez-Abreu & Martin-Lavielle and Javier Perez-Abreu and Andy W. Acosta, for appellant. Maurice Jay Kutner and Rand S. Lieber, for appellee.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and COPE and GODERICH, JJ.

PER CURIAM. Mario Gonzalez appeals a temporary support order. We

conclude that the amount is supported by the record and that the order is sufficiently specific for purposes of review here. See

Broadfoot v. Broadfoot, 791 So. 2d 584 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001). The appellant argues that reversal is required by the decision in Fleischfresser v. Accursio, 27 Fla. L. Weekly D 2335 (Fla. 3d DCA Oct. 30, 2002). trial court's order failed We disagree. to In that case, the between child

differentiate

support and temporary alimony.

More particularized findings There is no

were needed in order to permit appellate review.

child support issue in the present case and, in our view, the record adequately supports the amount awarded. Affirmed.

2

Download 3d02-1922.pdf