07-0383 GEORGE LESLIE RAY, III v. STATE OF FLORIDA

SUPREME COURT CASES

Laws-info.com » Cases » Florida » Florida First District Court » 2008 » 07-0383 GEORGE LESLIE RAY, III v. STATE OF FLORIDA

State: Florida

Court: Florida First District Court

Docket No: 07-0383

Case Date: 07/15/2008

Preview:IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA GEORGE LESLIE RAY, III, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. ____________________________/ NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED CASE NO. 1D07-0383

Opinion filed July 15, 2008. An appeal from the Circuit Court for Madison County. Leandra G. Johnson, Judge. Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and John B. Kelly, III, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant. Bill McCollum, Attorney General, and Charlie McCoy, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Office of the Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee. PER CURIAM. Appellant appeals his convictions, following a jury trial, for possession of a firearm by a convicted felon, possession of twenty grams or less of cannabis and possession of drug paraphernalia, and the denial of his rule 3.800(b)(2) motion to correct sentencing error. We affirm appellant's conviction without comment, but

reverse and remand for appellant to be resentenced pursuant to a properly calculated scoresheet. While his appeal was pending, appellant filed a motion to correct sentencing error pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b)(2), asserting that the scoresheet erroneously included fifteen points for possession of a firearm. The state concedes that the trial court erroneously scored the fifteen points for the possession of a firearm during the commission of a crime. See White v. State, 714 So. 2d 440 (Fla. 1998) (holding that it is error for a trial court to assess additional sentence points for possessing a firearm where the sole underlying crime is possession of a firearm by a convicted felon). Without the fifteen points for the firearm the appellant's total sentencing points are 42.4, rather than the 471 scored on his erroneous scoresheet. When a scoresheet error is raised on direct appeal via a rule 3.800(b) motion, courts must apply the "would-have-been-imposed" test to determine whether a scoresheet error warrants resentencing. Brooks v. State, 969 So. 2d 238, 241-42 (Fla. 2007) (citing State v. Anderson, 905 So. 2d 111 (Fla. 2005)). Under the "wouldhave-been-imposed" test, scoresheet error is considered harmless if the record

If the inclusion of the 15 points had been proper, the total sentencing points would actually have been 57, not 47 as indicated by the trial court. 2

1

conclusively shows that the trial court would have imposed the same sentence using a correct scoresheet. Id. We conclude that the record does not conclusively demonstrate that the trial court would have imposed the same sentence if the scoresheet had been calculated properly. Without the fifteen points for the firearm the appellant's total sentencing points are 42.4, rather than the 47 on his erroneous scoresheet. When total sentencing points are less than 44 points, the lowest permissible sentence is any non-state prison sanction. The trial court sentenced the appellant under the mistaken belief that the lowest permissible sentence was 24.7 months' imprisonment. We cannot say that the same sentence would have been imposed if the scoresheet had been correct. See Williams v. State, 720 So. 2d 590 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998) (holding that error on scoresheet is not harmless when presumptive sentence under corrected scoresheet would be any non-state prison sanction). Accordingly, we affirm appellant's convictions but reverse and remand for the trial court to resentence the appellant pursuant to a correctly calculated scoresheet. ALLEN, WOLF, AND POLSTON, JJ., CONCUR.

3

Download 07-0383 GEORGE LESLIE RAY, III v. STATE OF FLORIDA.pdf