07-4126 BRANDON MICHAEL WARD, v. STATE OF FLORIDA

State: Florida

Court: Florida First District Court

Docket No: 07-4126

Case Date: 07/16/2009

Preview:IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA BRANDON MICHAEL WARD, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. _____________________________/ Opinion filed July 16, 2009. An appeal from the Circuit Court for Santa Rosa County. Ronald V. Swanson, Judge. Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Nada M. Carey, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant. Bill McCollum, Attorney General, and Giselle Denise Lylen, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee. NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED CASE NO. 1D07-4126

PER CURIAM. Appellant, Brandon Michael Ward, challenges his convictions and sentences for second-degree murder and attempted second-degree on several grounds, three of which merit discussion. First, the trial court erred in instructing the jury on the charge of attempted first-degree murder that one of the victims was justified in

using non-deadly force against Appellant if the victim reasonably believed that he was in imminent danger of death or great bodily harm. The substitution of the victim's name for the defendant's name in the standard jury instruction on the justifiable use of non-deadly force was misleading and shifted the focus from Appellant's theory of self-defense to whether or not the victim had a legal right to attack Appellant. Butler v. State, 493 So. 2d 451 (Fla. 1986). Second, the trial court erred in instructing the jury on the forcible felony exception to self-defense on the charge of attempted first-degree murder because Appellant claimed selfdefense as to both charges and there was not a separate forcible felony for the jury to consider. Gilchrist v. State, 938 So. 2d 654, 655 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006). Finally, fundamental error occurred in this case when the trial court gave the standard jury instruction for the lesser included offense of manslaughter by act, which improperly imposed the additional element of intent to kill. Montgomery v. State, 34 Fla. L. Weekly D360 (Fla. 1st DCA Feb. 12, 2009) (question certified; conflict certified). Therefore, this case is reversed and remanded for a new trial. REVERSED and REMANDED. BARFIELD, DAVIS, and ROBERTS, JJ., CONCUR.

2

Download 07-4126 BRANDON MICHAEL WARD, v. STATE OF FLORIDA.pdf