10-0423 CHRISTOPHER ALAN AYOTTE, v. STATE OF FLORIDA

SUPREME COURT CASES

Laws-info.com » Cases » Florida » Florida First District Court » 2011 » 10-0423 CHRISTOPHER ALAN AYOTTE, v. STATE OF FLORIDA

State: Florida

Court: Florida First District Court

Docket No: 10-0423

Case Date: 07/07/2011

Preview:IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA CHRISTOPHER ALAN AYOTTE, Appellant, CASE NO. 1D10-0423 v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. _____________________________/ Opinion filed July 7, 2011. An appeal from the Circuit Court for Escambia County. Paul A. Rasmussen, Judge. Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender and A. Victoria Wiggins, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General and Thomas H. Duffy, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee. NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CLARK, J. Appellant challenges his conviction, after jury trial, for trafficking in hydrocodone in violation of section 893.135(1)(c)1., Florida Statutes. Because the Standard Criminal Jury Instructions were not sufficient to inform the jury of the statutory exception raised by the evidence, because the state argued to the jury that "knowing possession" was sufficient to support a conviction, and because the

statutory exception for lawfully prescribed hydrocodone was Appellant's only defense, we reverse. The charge of trafficking in hydrocodone stemmed from an evening spent by Appellant with his girlfriend at a bar in Pensacola. The arresting officer testified that he had observed Appellant showing some pills to another patron and possibly exchanging them, and that Appellant confessed to the officer that he was selling the pills to pay for drinks. Appellant denied these actions and explained that the pills only left his pocket accidentally, when they fell out as he was reaching for his cigarettes in the same pocket. Whether or not the jury believed any transaction took place, there was no factual dispute that 6.6 grams of hydrocodone pills were found on Appellant's person, an amount constituting "trafficking in illegal drugs" under section 893.135(1)(c)1., Florida Statutes. Appellant's sole theory of innocence was that he was holding the pills for his girlfriend, who had a valid prescription for the pills but no pockets in her evening's attire in which to carry them herself during the couple's outing. Both Appellant and his girlfriend (who were married at the time of the trial), told the jury that Appellant was carrying the pills at the girlfriend's request, providing some evidence that Appellant was acting as his girlfriend's agent. The validity of the companion's prescription was not challenged by the state and in fact was conceded in both closing argument and rebuttal. 2

Section 893.135(1) introduces the prohibitions on selling, purchasing, and actually or constructively possessing the various controlled substances listed thereafter with the phrase: "Except as authorized in this chapter or in chapter 499, and notwithstanding the provisions of s. 893.13." Sections 499.03 and 893.13(6), Florida Statutes, each provide exceptions to the prohibition on possession of certain controlled substances when such substance was obtained by a valid prescription. The standard jury instructions given at trial (25.11

Download 10-0423 CHRISTOPHER ALAN AYOTTE, v. STATE OF FLORIDA.pdf