4D09-3289-Jerrold Jackson v. State

SUPREME COURT CASES

Laws-info.com » Cases » Florida » Fourth District Court of Appeal » 2012 » 4D09-3289-Jerrold Jackson v. State

State: Florida

Court: Florida Southern District Court

Docket No: 4D09-3289.op

Case Date: 01/11/2012

Plaintiff: 4D09-3289-Jerrold Jackson

Defendant: State

Preview:DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
FOURTH DISTRICT
January Term 2012

JERROLD JACKSON, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. No. 4D09-3289 [January 11, 2012] STEVENSON, J. Defendant, Jerrold Jackson, appeals his conviction for trafficking in cocaine in an amount of 200 grams or more, but less than 400 grams, and possession of cannabis, in an amount of twenty grams or less. Defendant was sentenced to fifteen years with a seven-year mandatory minimum on the cocaine charge and to time served on the misdemeanor possession of marijuana. Because the State failed to establish that the weight of the cocaine was 200 grams or more, we reverse with instructions that this conviction b e reduced to the lesser offense of trafficking in cocaine in an amount of twenty-eight grams or more, but less than 200 grams, and that his sentence be modified accordingly. At Defendant's trial, a police officer testified that he first came in contact with Defendant when he arrived at his residence to execute a search warrant. During the search, a substance that appeared to be powder cocaine was discovered. A canine was called to the scene and alerted to several locations throughout the residence. A crime lab technician testified that she tested two items recovered from Defendant's residence. Item one consisted of eight baggies containing a powdery substance. The chemist tested a random sample of the powder and concluded that the powder was cocaine. The eight baggies had a combined weight of 182.7 grams. The chemist also tested two baggies containing cocaine rocks. Bag one weighed 22.9 grams and bag two weighed 6.6 grams. On cross-examination, the chemist testified that she tested only one of the eight baggies containing the powdery substance. She indicated that she could not confirm that the other

seven bags contained cocaine. Defendant moved for a judgment of acquittal, arguing that the State failed to meet its burden as to possession of cocaine in an amount exceeding 200 grams because no evidence was presented that the other seven baggies contained cocaine. The trial court denied the motion. A trial court's denial of a motion for judgment of acquittal is reviewed de novo. See Guinan v. State, 65 So. 3d 589, 593 (Fla. 4th DCA 2011). "Generally, a trial court should not grant a motion for judgment of acquittal unless, when viewed in a light most favorable to the State, the evidence does not establish a prima facie case of guilt." Bussell v. State, 66 So. 3d 1059, 1061 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011). In Ross v. State, 528 So. 2d 1237 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988), the defendant's conviction for trafficking in cocaine was reversed because the State failed to prove that he possessed twenty-eight grams or more of cocaine where only two of ninety-two separately-packaged packets were tested. Id. at 1238. While the total weight of the ninety-two packets exceeded twentyeight grams, the two packets that were tested weighed less than that amount. Id. The Third DCA reasoned that: [A] visual examination of untested packets of this weight is insufficient to convict because the white powder contained therein may be milk sugar or any one of a vast variety of other white powdery chemical compounds not containing cocaine. Moreover, the fact that one or two packets containing cocaine are f o u n d among other packets containing similar-looking white powder is no assurance that the latter untested packets also contain cocaine in view of (1) the vast number of other chemical compounds which have a similar white powdery appearance, and (2) the fact that the material in the untested packets was not commingled with the material in the tested packets. Id. at 1239

Download 4D09-3289.op.pdf