Find Laws Find Lawyers Free Legal Forms USA State Laws
Laws-info.com » Cases » Florida » Florida Fifth District Court » 2002 » 5D01-1874 Oliver v. State
5D01-1874 Oliver v. State
State: Florida
Court: Florida Fifth District Court
Docket No: 5D01-1874
Case Date: 02/18/2002
Preview:IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JANUARY TERM 2002

JAMES LEE OLIVER, Appellant, v. Case No. 5D01-1874

STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. / Opinion Filed February 22, 2002 3.850 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Marion County, Carven D. Angel, Judge. James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Rebecca M. Becker, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant. Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Anthony J. Golden, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM. Oliver appeals an order summarily denying ground two of his Rule 3.8501 motion for postconviction relief. Because the lower court failed to attach portions of the record to conclusively refute Oliver' s claims, our review is limited to determining whether, accepting the allegations as true, the motion shows the defendant is not entitled to relief. Edwards

1

Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.850 (2001).

v. State, 652 So. 2d 1276, 1277 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995). Although the court gave a reason for denying ground two, its rationale did not address the issue raised in the postconviction motion. The court stated that Oliver failed to " show any legal theory that would have justified excluding the testimony of this witness." Oliver was not arguing that the witness should have been excluded. Rather, he argued that portions of the witness'testimony were improper and prejudicial. Because the trial court failed to attach portions of the record to conclusively refute Oliver' s claim, we reverse and remand to the trial court with instructions to either attach records which conclusively refute Oliver' s allegations, or conduct an evidentiary hearing. Finally, we note that Oliver did not appeal the denial of grounds one and three of his motion after an evidentiary hearing. We therefore affirm that portion of the order denying grounds one and three. AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART. PETERSON, GRIFFIN and PLEUS, JJ., concur.

2

Download 5D01-1874 Oliver v. State.pdf

Florida Law

Florida State Laws
Florida State
    > Florida Counties
    > Florida Senators
    > Florida Zip Codes
Florida Tax
Florida Labor Laws
Florida Agencies
    > Florida DMV

Comments

Tips