5D02-1238 Matisko v. Matisko

State: Florida

Court: Florida Fifth District Court

Docket No: 5D02-1238

Case Date: 01/13/2003

Preview:IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JANUARY TERM 2003

ROBERT J. MATISKO, Appellant, v. WANDA E. MATISKO, Appellee. / Opinion Filed January 17, 2003 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Orange County, Walter Komanski, Judge. Robert J. Matisko, Fern Park, pro se. Paula Pratt and James E. Cheek, III, of Winderweedle, Haines, Ward & Woodman, P.A., Winter Park, for Appellee. PER CURIAM. AFFIRMED. Husband has failed to demonstrate any error in the rulings made by the trial court. Specifically, husband has failed to show that it was error to award wife all of the marital home, which was hers by inheritance, as her separate property. Nor did the trial court err in excluding certain evidence as irrelevant to the issues in the case. Finally, the husband's failure to obtain a ruling on his motion for sanctions precludes consideration on appeal of whether the motion should have been granted. CASE NO. 5D02-1238

SHARP, W., GRIFFIN and ORFINGER, JJ., concur.

-2-

Download 5D02-1238 Matisko v. Matisko.pdf