5D03-2270 State Farm v. Gibbons

State: Florida

Court: Florida Fifth District Court

Docket No: 5D03-2270

Case Date: 12/01/2003

Preview:IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JULY TERM 2003

STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE, etc., Petitioner, v. LISA GIBBONS, Respondent. _________________________________/ Opinion filed December 5, 2003 Petition for Certiorari Review of Order from the Circuit Court for Seminole County, Nancy F. Alley, Judge. Gregory W. Herbert, of Greenberg Traurig, P.A., Orlando, and David L. Ross and Elliot H. Scherker, of Greenberg Traurig, P.A., Miami, for Petitioner. Gilbert S. Goshorn, Jr., and Shannon McLin Carlyle, of The Carlyle Appellant Law Firm, The Villages, and Gregory S. Stark, of McKeever, Albert & Barth, Winter Park, for Respondent, Lisa Gibbons. CASE NO. 5D03-2270

TORPY, J. Respondent, Lisa Gibbons, sued her insurer, Petitioner, State Farm, alleging that State Farm had not complied with section 627.0651(12), Florida Statutes (2002), which prohibits insurance companies from including in their rate base monies paid on bad faith and punitive damages claims and related attorney's fees and taxable costs. She alleged that she tried administrative action, but that the Department of Insurance (DOI) basically ignored her,

resulting in her filing this suit in the circuit court. State Farm moved for a judgment on the pleadings on the basis that the only way to challenge approved rates is in an administrative proceeding in the Office of Insurance Regulation ("OIR"), the former Florida Department of Insurance. Rather than dismissing the claim, the trial court stayed the proceedings to allow Gibbons to institute an administrative action. Thereafter, Gibbons instituted an administrative proceeding, but expressly told the OIR that she wished to have her claim rejected so that she could return to the circuit court and resume her action against State Farm. When the OIR granted Gibbons' wish, determining that, based on the information that she had presented, there was no relief that could be afforded to her, Gibbons returned to the circuit court and asked it to lift the stay so that she could go forward with her action. The circuit court agreed, and State Farm timely sought certiorari review. We have jurisdiction. Art. V, section 4(b), Fla. Const.; Department of Children and Families v. L.D., 840 So. 2d 432, 434 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003). We grant the petition. Contrary to the position taken by Gibbons, the exclusive remedy for asserting a claim based on a purported violation of section 627.0651, is to seek administrative review pursuant to section 627.371, Florida Statutes (2002). Furthermore, once administrative review is completed, the exclusive jurisdiction for judicial review is in the District Court of Appeal.

Download 5D03-2270 State Farm v. Gibbons.pdf