5D08-1366 Humberto Mairena v. State

SUPREME COURT CASES

Laws-info.com » Cases » Florida » Florida Fifth District Court » 2009 » 5D08-1366 Humberto Mairena v. State

State: Florida

Court: Florida Fifth District Court

Docket No: 5D08-1366

Case Date: 03/02/2009

Preview:IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JANUARY TERM 2009

HUMBERTO MAIRENA, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. ________________________________/ Opinion filed March 6, 2009 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Brevard County, Charles M. Holcomb, Judge. Lawrence V. Johnston, Senior Judge. James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Noel A. Pelella, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant. Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Carmen F. Corrente, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee. Case No. 5D08-1366

ORFINGER, J. Humberto Mairena appeals his conviction of sexual battery on a child less than 12 years of age. He contends that the trial court erred by conducting his trial when the court was presented with reasonable grounds to question his competency. We reverse Mairena's conviction and remand for a new trial contingent upon a determination that Mairena is competent to proceed.

Mairena was charged with capital sexual battery.

Early in the proceedings,

defense counsel moved for appointment of an expert to determine Mairena's competence, alleging: 2. The Defendant has a history of mental illness and has undergone psychiatric treatment for same in South Florida. Due to the serious nature of the charge and the Defendant's limited ability to communicate with counsel regarding the extent of his mental disabilities, undersigned counsel requests a competency evaluation to determine if the Defendant's current mental condition is adequate to proceed with this case. 3. Undersigned counsel certifies that this motion is made in good faith and that counsel has reasonable grounds to believe that the Defendant presently suffers from mental disabilities that cause him to be incompetent to proceed with this case. The trial court ordered a competency evaluation and appointed a single mental health expert. After the evaluation was performed, the trial court entered an order, finding Mairena competent to stand trial. Five months later, Mairena came before the court at a scheduled hearing. At that time, the State offered Mairena a plea to a lesser charge. Mairena indicated that he would accept the State's offer and the court proceeded with a plea colloquy. When the court asked Mairena how he wished to plead, the following exchange occurred: THE COURT: . . . What is your plea? MAIRENA: At that time I had treatment, psychiatric treatment. THE COURT: I'm sorry? He had what? MAIRENA: Psychiatric treatment. I was in clinic in Miami for thirty days because I had problem after my divorce and I couldn't sleep and I could hear voices in my head. Yes. And also I was taking medication. I was taking medication.

2

THE COURT: Well, the plea has to be either guilty or not guilty. MAIRENA: It's between guilty or not guilty? [DEFENSE COUNSEL]: Yes, one or the other. THE COURT: To enter a plea to resolve the case it has to be guilty. If you want a trial, your plea would be not guilty. Are you claiming to have no recollection of the facts or are you just stating matters in mitigation of sentence? MAIRENA: Yes. Yes, I do. THE COURT: Yes what? MAIRENA: Yes, at that time I had voices in my mind. I don't know. I had voices in my head that was telling me to do. I don't know if I - - if I - - if I thought that I did it. THE COURT: Well, we need to proceed with the child hearsay hearing so that we'll be ready for trial next week. [DEFENSE COUNSEL]: As you recall, Judge, he was evaluated on just this issue. THE COURT: He was evaluated and the doctor said he was competent to proceed? [DEFENSE COUNSEL]: He was. THE COURT: I don't know if he's attempting to raise an insanity defense or if counsel could in good faith assert an insanity defense. I want to make sure he understands that he's losing the State's offer. And when he goes to trial if he's convicted, the Court will have no alternative but to sentence him to life in the State Penitentiary without possibility of parole. ....

THE COURT: Well, I couldn't take the plea because he wouldn't give me an answer one way or the other.

3

The trial began two months later before a different judge. selection, the following occurred:

Just prior to jury

[DEFENSE COUNSEL]: . . . Judge, Mr. Mairena has been explained the ramifications of a plea or a trial, possible outcome, strengths and weaknesses of his trial, we've had him evaluated for competency and he has come back competent. He has indicated to me that he wanted me to pursue an insanity defense, however, his actions around the time of the incident one hundred percent preclude such a defense as far as my investigation [has] determined and through my experience I've learned that. I just asked him a few moments ago if he understood that the little girl could testify here today . . . and I don't believe he wants her to have to take the stand. He's indicated to me that he'd like to enter a plea to the Court. He understands that the sentence would be the same whether he went to trial and was found guilty as charged or if he pled to the Court because the sentence is life without parole. I wanted him to address the Court before you proceed in that grain. THE COURT: Yes, okay, okay. [DEFENSE COUNSEL]: Mr. Mairena, is it your wish to enter a plea to the Court? THE DEFENDANT: What I want to say if it's reasonable to give me the sentence today. I have been 27 days in the cell, in the bubble, because they put me there. It's like this for my doctor - - the doctor give me medication. I don't know. Since 2005[,] I have a grave severe depression, and I was put in a clinic for mental disabilities. And since then I've been taking my medication. [DEFENSE COUNSEL]: medication today sir? THE DEFENDANT: Yes. [DEFENSE COUNSEL]: Are you thinking clearly? Are you taking your

4

THE DEFENDANT: I know that I have in my head - it's a scream that I'm crazy. I hear voices and sounds. I'm bad. My brain is hurting me. [DEFENSE COUNSEL]: been diagnosed with sir? Do you know what you've

THE DEFENDANT: I don't know. I didn't see the doctor since I got in but, still right now I'm still in the bubble. THE COURT: All right. We understand what your fears are and how you feel, but we'll either have to go to trial today or you can plea[d] guilty. If you plead guilty then we have to make sure that you're feeling well today and that you know what's going on. So, if you have a headache or if you have some voices in your head it would be difficult or impossible for me to accept your plea of guilty. Do you understand? THE DEFENDANT: Yes. I'm not in a condition to

Download 5D08-1366 Humberto Mairena v. State.pdf