Find Laws Find Lawyers Free Legal Forms USA State Laws
Laws-info.com » Cases » Florida » Florida Fifth District Court » 2008 » 5D08-3135 Clarence LeBlanc v. State
5D08-3135 Clarence LeBlanc v. State
State: Florida
Court: Florida Fifth District Court
Docket No: 5D08-3135
Case Date: 12/22/2008
Preview:IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JULY TERM 2008

CLARENCE BRIAN LEBLANC, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. ________________________________/ Opinion filed December 24, 2008 3.850 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hernando County, Stephen Rushing, Judge. Laurie K. Sweet, of The Law Firm of Kevin A. Moore, P.A., Tampa, for Appellant. Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Douglas T. Squire, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee. Case No. 5D08-3135

MONACO, J. This is an appeal by the appellant, Clarence Brian LeBlanc, from an order summarily denying his motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. The motion was based on six alleged deficiencies of trial counsel. We affirm without further comment the summary denial with respect to grounds four and five. We reverse, however, with respect to grounds one, two, three and six.

On appeal from a summary denial of a rule 3.850 motion we are compelled to reverse unless the post-conviction record shows conclusively that the appellant is entitled to no relief. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.141(b)(2)(D). Although the trial court in denying grounds one, two, three and six of the motion made reference to parts of the transcript or other record documents, it did not attach those record excerpts to the order for us to examine. Without that documentation we are unable to give meaningful review to the claims of the appellant. Accordingly, because the record before us fails to make a showing that the appellant is conclusively entitled to no relief, we reverse the order as it applies to grounds one, two, three and six, and remand to the trial court to attach record excerpts that conclusively demonstrate that Mr. LeBlanc is entitled to no relief. Failing that, the trial court must accord Mr. LeBlanc an evidentiary hearing on these four grounds. See Ingram v. State, 990 So. 2d 16 (Fla. 5th DCA 2008). AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part; REMANDED.

TORPY and COHEN, JJ., concur.

2

Download 5D08-3135 Clarence LeBlanc v. State.pdf

Florida Law

Florida State Laws
Florida State
    > Florida Counties
    > Florida Senators
    > Florida Zip Codes
Florida Tax
Florida Labor Laws
Florida Agencies
    > Florida DMV

Comments

Tips