5D10-3224 Devore Thomas v. State

SUPREME COURT CASES

Laws-info.com » Cases » Florida » Florida Fifth District Court » 2012 » 5D10-3224 Devore Thomas v. State

State: Florida

Court: Florida Fifth District Court

Docket No: 5D10-3224

Case Date: 06/11/2012

Preview:IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JANUARY TERM 2012

DEVORE L. THOMAS, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. ________________________________/ Opinion filed June 15, 2012 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Citrus County, Richard A. Howard, Judge. James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Robert E. Wildridge, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Carmen F. Corrente, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee. Case No. 5D10-3224

PALMER, J. Devore Laron Thomas (defendant) appeals his conviction for aggravated battery. Determining that the trial court fundamentally erred by issuing a faulty jury instruction on attempted voluntary manslaughter, we reverse. The defendant was charged with attempted first-degree murder. The matter proceeded to trial before a jury. During the jury charge, the trial court issued instructions on several lesser included offenses, including attempted voluntary manslaughter. The

instructions and verdict form presented the offenses in the following order: attempted second-degree murder, aggravated battery, attempted voluntary manslaughter, and battery. The jury found the defendant guilty of aggravated battery.1 The Florida Supreme Court has ruled that the standard jury instruction on manslaughter is defective. State v. Montgomery, 39 So. 3d 252, 257 (Fla. 2010). In Montgomery, the Court further stated that failing to properly instruct the jury on manslaughter, when it is one step below the crime for which the defendant is convicted, is fundamental error. Id. at 259. "If the jury is not properly instructed on the next lower crime, then it is impossible to determine whether, having been properly instructed, it would have found the defendant guilty of the next lesser offense." Pena v. State, 901 So. 2d 781, 787 (Fla. 2005). Our court has recently applied Montgomery to attempted voluntary manslaughter. Burton v. State, 36 Fla. L. Weekly D738 (Fla. 5th DCA Apr. 8, 2011). Both parties agree that the trial court issued a faulty instruction on the lesser included offense of attempted voluntary manslaughter. The State maintains, however, that the issuance of the faulty instruction was harmless because aggravated battery is actually a lesser included offense of attempted voluntary manslaughter. We disagree. The error was not harmless because, based on the order in which the charges were set forth in the instructions and verdict form, the jury could reasonably have concluded that the offenses were presented in descending order of seriousness and that attempted voluntary manslaughter was less serious than aggravated battery. As such, "it is impossible to determine whether the jury, if given the opportunity, would have

1

See

Download 5D10-3224 Devore Thomas v. State.pdf