Find Laws Find Lawyers Free Legal Forms USA State Laws
Laws-info.com » Cases » Hawaii » Appellate Court » 2000 » Duda v. Rockwell Power Systems Co.
Duda v. Rockwell Power Systems Co.
State: Hawaii
Court: Court of Appeals
Docket No: 22240
Case Date: 08/15/2000
Preview:NO. 22240 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I _________________________________________________________________ ANDREW J. DUDA, Plaintiff-Appellee and BURTON D. GOULD, Real Party-in-Interest-Appellant vs. ROCKWELL POWER SYSTEMS CO., a Delaware Corporation; RON CHAPMAN, LARRY DECAMBRA, and ART SCHROEDER, Defendants-Appellees _________________________________________________________________

APPEAL FROM THE SECOND CIRCUIT COURT (CIV. NO. 95-0251(2))

SUMMARY DISPOSITION ORDER (By: Moon, C.J., Levinson, Nakayama, and Ramil, JJ., and Circuit Judge Marks, assigned by reason of vacancy) Burton D. Gould appeals from the second circuit court's January 12, 1999 judgment granting Rockwell Power Systems, Co., Ron Chapman, Larry DeCambra, and Art Schroeder's motion for award of attorneys' fees and costs and Hawai#i Rules of Civil Procedure (HRCP) Rule 11 sanctions. Gould argues that the circuit court erred in (1) sanctioning him jointly and severally with his former client Andrew J. Duda; (2) finding that Gould failed to make a reasonable investigation into the facts and law; (3) finding that Gould withdrew because he thought that the case was unworthy; and (4) construing Gould's opposition to the request for fees, costs,

and sanctions as a basis for holding him jointly and severally liable with Duda. Gould did not properly raise, and we therefore decline to address, whether HRCP Rule 11 provided the appropriate sanctioning authority in this case. See Hawai#i Rules of

Appellate Procedure (HRAP) Rule 28(b)(4) (Appellant must include a "concise statement of the points on which appellant intends to rely, set forth in separate, numbered paragraphs. Each point

shall refer to the alleged error committed by the court or agency upon which appellant intends to rely[.]"); HRAP Rule 28(b)(7) (Appellant must set forth "[t]he argument, exhibiting clearly the points of fact and of law being presented."). Therefore,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the judgment from which the appeal is taken is affirmed. DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, August 15, 2000.

On the briefs: Burton D. Gould, real party-in-interestappellant Jared H. Jossem and Lynne T. Toyofuku for defendants-appellees

-2-

Download Duda v. Rockwell Power Systems Co..pdf

Hawaii Law

Hawaii State Laws
Hawaii State
    > Hawaii Zip Code
Hawaii Tax
Hawaii Agencies
    > Hawaii DMV

Comments

Tips