Preview:

NO. 22031 IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

JERRY PACARIEM,

) ) Petitioner-Appellant, ) ) vs. ) ) STATE OF HAWAI#I, ) ) Respondent-Appellee, ) )

S.P.P. NO. 97-0043 (CR. NO. 91-0729) APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT

SUMMARY DISPOSITION ORDER

After carefully reviewing the record and the briefs submitted by the parties and duly considering and analyzing the law relevant to the arguments and issues raised by the parties, we conclude that the claims raised by Petitioner-Appellant Jerry Pacariem in his Hawai#i Rules of Penal Procedure (HRPP) Rule 40 Petition for Post-Conviction Relief were either not properly presented for appeal, previously ruled upon, waived, or not colorable. Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the October 5, 1998 Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law and Order Denying Request for Hearing on Rule 40 Petition is affirmed. DATED: Honolulu, Hawaii, June 28, 2000.

On the briefs: Richard T. Pafundi for petitioner-appellant. Alexa D. M. Fujise, Deputy Prosecuting Attorney, City and County of Honolulu, for respondent-appellee. JAMES S. BURNS Chief Judge

CORINNE K. A. WATANABE Associate Judge

JOHN S. W. LIM Associate Judge



Download Pacariem v. State.pdf

Hawaii Law