Preview:

NO. 24631 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I SUNTERA, THE SOLAR ELECTRIC CHARIOT COMPANY, a Hawai#i corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant vs. THOMAS QUINN; HAWAII ELECTRIC VEHICLE DEMONSTRATION PROJECT; BARBARA KIM-STANTON; HERBERT HENDRICKSON; DAVID YUN; HIGH TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, a Hawai#i corporation; KENNETH KATO; RICHARD MOODY; MAURICE KAYA; STATE OF HAWAI#I OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL, Defendants-Appellees MCCORRISTON MILLER MUKAI MACKINNON LLP, Party-in-Interest-Appellee and ARGYLE TELEVISION COMPANY; CATHERINE CRUZ; JOHN DOE AND JANE ROES, INDIVIDUALS 1 THROUGH 12; DOE PARTNERSHIPS 1 THROUGH 12; DOE CORPORATIONS 1 THROUGH 12; DOE MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONS 1 THROUGH 5 AND STATE AGENCIES 1 THROUGH 5, Defendants APPEAL FROM THE FIRST CIRCUIT COURT (CIV. NO. 96-3580) ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL (By: Moon, C.J., Levinson, Nakayama, Ramil, and Acoba, JJ.) Upon review of the record, it appears that the circuit court's October 8, 2001 order is not an order denying a motion to compel arbitration under HRS

Download Suntera, The Solar Electric Chariot Company v. Quinn.pdf

Hawaii Law