Preview:

Pursuant to Ind.Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collateral estoppel, or the law of the case. ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANT: RICHARD R. FOX STEVEN A. GUSTAFSON New Albany, Indiana

FILED
Feb 24 2009, 8:48 am
of the supreme court, court of appeals and tax court

CLERK

ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE: DONALD S. SMITH CHERYL D. FINCHUM Indianapolis, Indiana

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA
CHRISTAL CHANDLER, Appellant-Plaintiff, vs. HARDIGG INDUSTRIES, Appellee-Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

No. 93A02-0806-EX-549

APPEAL FROM THE INDIANA WORKER'S COMPENSATION BOARD The Honorable Linda Peterson Hamilton, Chairman Application No. C-150985

FEBRUARY 24, 2009 MEMORANDUM DECISION - NOT FOR PUBLICATION SHARPNACK, Senior Judge

STATEMENT OF THE CASE Plaintiff-Appellant Christal Chandler appeals the award of the Worker's Compensation Board ("Board"). We affirm. ISSUES Chandler presents four issues for our review, which we consolidate and restate as: I. Whether the Board erred by finding that Defendant-Appellee Hardigg Industries provided proper notice to Chandler under Ind. Code

Download Christal Chandler v. Hardigg Industries.pdf

Indiana Law