Preview:

Pursuant to Ind.Appellate Rule 65(D),  this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collateral estoppel, or the law of the case.





ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT: ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE:

THOMAS G. GODFREY GREGORY F. ZOELLER
Anderson, Indiana Attorney General of Indiana
   Indianapolis, Indiana

   JOBY D. JERRELLS
   Deputy Attorney General
   Indianapolis, Indiana

  

IN THE
COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA



DAVID EUGENE BALL, )
)
Appellant-Defendant, )
)
vs. ) No. 48A02-0909-CR-940
)
STATE OF INDIANA, )
)
Appellee-Plaintiff. )



APPEAL FROM THE MADISON SUPERIOR COURT
The Honorable David A. Happe, Judge
Cause No. 48E01-0801-FD-00011
48E01-0812-FD-00440



JUNE 15, 2010

MEMORANDUM DECISION - NOT FOR PUBLICATION

BARTEAU, Senior Judge
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Appellant David Eugene Ball appeals the termination of his work release.  We affirm.
ISSUES
Ball raises two issues for our review, which we restate as:
I. Whether the trial court abused its discretion in terminating work release upon a condition not listed in the petition.  
II. Whether the trial court

Download 06151002bbs.pdf

Indiana Law