Preview:

Pursuant to Ind.Appellate Rule 65(D),  this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collateral estoppel, or the law of the case.






ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT: ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE:

MATTHEW G. GRANTHAM   GREGORY F. ZOELLER  
Bowers Brewer Garrett & Wiley, LLP Attorney General of Indiana  
Huntington, Indiana  

   ANDREW R. FALK  
Deputy Attorney General
Indianapolis, Indiana



IN THE
COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA



EMILY R. MEYER, )
)
Appellant-Defendant, )
)
vs. ) No. 35A02-1001-CR-69
)
STATE OF INDIANA, )
)
Appellee-Plaintiff. )



APPEAL FROM THE HUNTINGTON SUPERIOR COURT
The Honorable Jeffrey R. Heffelfinger, Judge
Cause No. 35D01-0901-FA-13



August 31, 2010

MEMORANDUM DECISION - NOT FOR PUBLICATION

BARNES, Judge
     Case Summary
Emily Meyer appeals her convictions for two counts of Class A felony dealing in a schedule I, II, or III controlled substance.  We affirm.
Issues
Meyer raises two issues, which we restate as:
I. whether the trial court properly denied her motion for a continuance; and

II. whether there is sufficient evidence to support her convictions as Class A felonies.

Facts
On April 3, 2008, Meyer sold two pills containing oxycodone to a confidential informant (

Download 08311002mpb.pdf

Indiana Law