Preview:

Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collateral estoppel, or the law of the case. ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT: JUNE E. BULES Plymouth, Indiana

FILED
Dec 22 2009, 10:23 am
of the supreme court, court of appeals and tax court

CLERK

ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE: GREGORY F. ZOELLER Attorney General of Indiana KARL M. SCHARNBERG Deputy Attorney General Indianapolis, Indiana

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA
ERIC TAYLOR, Appellant-Defendant, vs. STATE OF INDIANA, Appellee-Plaintiff. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

No. 75A05-0903-CR-159

APPEAL FROM THE STARKE CIRCUIT COURT The Honorable Kim Hall, Judge Cause No. 75C01-0706-FB-9

December 22, 2009 MEMORANDUM DECISION - NOT FOR PUBLICATION DARDEN, Judge

STATEMENT OF THE CASE Eric Taylor appeals his convictions, after a jury trial, of dealing in methamphetamine, a class B felony, and possession of methamphetamine, a class D felony. We affirm. ISSUE Whether Taylor was denied his right to effective assistance of counsel when his trial attorney did not file a motion to suppress evidence. FACTS At approximately 3:00 a.m. on June 27, 2007, Jeffrey Beavers

Download Eric Taylor v. State of Indiana.pdf

Indiana Law