Preview:

Pursuant to Ind.Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collateral estoppel, or the law of the case.

FILED
Apr 03 2008, 9:10 am
of the supreme court, court of appeals and tax court

CLERK

ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT: LARRY W. MEDLOCK Medlock Law Office Paoli, Indiana

ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE: STEVE CARTER Attorney General of Indiana JESSICA A. MEEK Deputy Attorney General Indianapolis, Indiana

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA
JILL A. HAYDEN, Appellant-Defendant, vs. STATE OF INDIANA, Appellee-Plaintiff. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

No. 59A01-0709-CR-442

APPEAL FROM THE ORANGE CIRCUIT COURT The Honorable Kenneth L. Lopp, Special Judge Cause Nos. 59C01-0408-FD-096, 59C01-0408-FD-087 59C01-0408-CM-086, and 59C01-0408-FB-084

April 3, 2008 MEMORANDUM DECISION - NOT FOR PUBLICATION BAILEY, Judge

Case Summary Appellant-Defendant Jill A. Hayden ("Hayden") appeals her reinstated sentences due to the revocation of her probation. We affirm. 1 Issues Hayden raises two issues for review: I. Whether the trial court abused its discretion in reinstating her entire suspended sentences; and Whether the trial court erred in calculating her credit time. Facts and Procedural History 2 Pursuant to a plea agreement, Hayden was sentenced on December 20, 2005, 3 to the following: Plea of Guilty to Count 1 in FD-096 [Possession of Marijuana] 1

Download Jill A Hayden v. State of Indiana.pdf

Indiana Law