Preview:

Pursuant to Ind.Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collateral estoppel, or the law of the case. ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT: MARK A. DELGADO Indianapolis, Indiana

FILED
Dec 30 2011, 9:08 am
of the supreme court, court of appeals and tax court

CLERK

ATTORNEY FOR APPELLEE: MATTHEW E. DUMAS Hostetter & O'Hara Brownsburg, Indiana

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA
LARRY D. BROSSMAN, Appellant-Petitioner, vs. TERESA A. DIGRIGOLI, Appellee-Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

No. 32A01-1103-DR-106

APPEAL FROM THE HENDRICKS CIRCUIT COURT The Honorable Jeffrey V. Boles, Judge Cause No. 32C01-1004-DR-51 December 30, 2011 MEMORANDUM DECISION - NOT FOR PUBLICATION

MAY, Judge

Larry Brossman ("Husband") appeals the denial of his motion to correct error. However, all the issues he raises on appeal challenge the validity of specific provisions in the 2008 decree dissolving his marriage to Teresa DiGrigoli ("Wife"). As those challenges are not timely, we affirm. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY Husband and Wife divorced and their dissolution decree was issued August 8, 2008. It provided, among other things, that Wife was entitled to half of Husband's military pension and to incapacity maintenance.1 On August 27, 2008, Husband petitioned to modify the decree on a ground he now asserts again on appeal

Download Larry D. Brossman v. Teresa A. Digrigoli.pdf

Indiana Law