Preview:

Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collateral estoppel, or the law of the case. ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT: AMY L. CUELLER The Cueller Law Office Indianapolis, Indiana ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEES: BRIAN L. ENGLAND RYAN J. GUILLORY Hunt Suedhoff Kalamaros LLP Indianapolis, Indiana

FILED
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA
MARIA ESPINOZA, Appellant-Plaintiff, vs. ROSA MARTINEZ, MI FAMILIA TIENDA, and NASSIROU GADO, Appellees-Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
Dec 29 2011, 9:21 am
of the supreme court, court of appeals and tax court

CLERK

No. 49A02-1104-CT-373

APPEAL FROM THE MARION SUPERIOR COURT The Honorable Timothy Oakes, Judge Cause No. 49D13-0710-CT-42608

December 29, 2011 MEMORANDUM DECISION

Download Maria Espinoza v. Rosa Martinez, Mi Familia Tienda, and Nassirou Gado.pdf

Indiana Law