Preview:

Pursuant to Ind.Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collateral estoppel, or the law of the case.

FILED
Dec 27 2011, 9:26 am
of the supreme court, court of appeals and tax court

CLERK

ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT: STEVEN KNECHT Vonderheide & Knecht, P.C. Lafayette, Indiana

ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE: GREGORY F. ZOELLER Attorney General of Indiana

GARY R. ROM
Deputy Attorney General Indianapolis, Indiana

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA
MARK A. CONLEY, Appellant-Defendant, vs. STATE OF INDIANA, Appellee-Plaintiff. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

No. 08A04-1104-CR-204

APPEAL FROM THE CARROLL SUPERIOR COURT The Honorable Kurtis G. Fouts, Judge Cause No. 08D01-1004-FD-35

December 27, 2011 MEMORANDUM DECISION - NOT FOR PUBLICATION BAILEY, Judge

Case Summary Mark A. Conley ("Conley") appeals from his conviction for Escape, as a Class D felony.1 He raises a single issue for our review, whether the trial court erred when it denied his motion for a directed verdict because the sentencing order that committed him to home detention did not provide notice that he could be prosecuted for Escape if he failed to comply with the conditions of home detention. We affirm. Facts and Procedural History On July 25, 2007, Conley pled guilty to Operation of a Vehicle while Intoxicated2 and Operating a Motor Vehicle while Privileges are Suspended3 in Cause Number 79D06-0607FD-00153 in Tippecanoe County. He was sentenced to two terms of 1

Download Mark A. Conley v. State of Indiana.pdf

Indiana Law