Preview:

Pursuant to Ind.Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collateral estoppel, or the law of the case.

FILED
Jun 11 2012, 9:58 am
of the supreme court, court of appeals and tax court

CLERK

ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT: WILLIAM S. FRANKEL, IV Wilkinson, Goeller, Modesitt, Wilkinson & Drummy, LLP Terre Haute, Indiana

ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE: GREGORY F. ZOELLER Attorney General of Indiana JOSEPH Y. HO Deputy Attorney General Indianapolis, Indiana

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA
MICHAEL L. CRISS, Appellant-Defendant, vs. STATE OF INDIANA, Appellee-Plaintiff. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

No. 84A05-1111-CR-632

APPEAL FROM THE VIGO SUPERIOR COURT The Honorable David R. Bolk, Judge Cause No. 84D03-0811-FC-3590

June 11, 2012 MEMORANDUM DECISION - NOT FOR PUBLICATION BAILEY, Judge

Case Summary Michael L. Criss ("Criss") appeals an order revoking his community corrections placement and committing him to the Indiana Department of Correction ("the DOC") to serve three years of his sentence for Battery, as a Class C felony. He presents the sole issue of whether the revocation was improperly predicated upon his failure to pay intake fees, despite his financial inability to do so. We affirm. Facts and Procedural History On March 29, 2010, Criss pled guilty to Battery; he was sentenced to four years imprisonment, with two years suspended and two years to be served in the Vigo County Community Corrections Program ("the Work Release Program"). Criss was ordered to begin his sentence in work release within thirty days. After sentencing, Criss contacted the Work Release Program and was given a reporting time of 9:00 a.m. on June 2, 2010. Criss did not report as scheduled on June 2, 2010. On June 4, 2010, a letter from Criss, dated June 3, 2010, was filed in the Vigo County Superior Court. In the letter, Criss asked for an extension of time to report to work release, due to a job loss and inability to pay work release intake fees. On June 8, 2010, the State filed a petition to revoke Criss's probation and placement in the Work Release Program. The trial court set the matter for hearing on June 21, 2010. Mail to Criss was returned due to an incorrect address, and he did not appear on the hearing date. A warrant was issued for his arrest. On September 7, 2011, Criss appeared in police custody and the petition to revoke probation was again set for hearing. 2

On October 6, 2011, the trial court heard evidence, found that Criss had violated the terms of his probation, revoked his Work Release Program placement, and ordered three years of his sentence to be served in the Indiana Department of Correction. This appeal ensued. Discussion and Decision Criss concedes that he did not timely report to the Work Release Program. However, he maintains that his failure to do so is attributable to an inability to pay intake fees, and that the trial court should not revoke probation when he is unable to comply with its terms. A reviewing court treats a petition to revoke a placement in a community corrections program the same as a petition to revoke probation. Cox v. State, 706 N.E.2d 547, 549 (Ind. 1999). Community corrections is "a program consisting of residential and work release, electronic monitoring, day treatment, or day reporting[.]" Ind. Code

Download Michael L. Criss v. State of Indiana.pdf

Indiana Law