Preview:

Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collateral estoppel, or the law of the case. ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT: BRIDGETTE F. GREENE Elkhart, Indiana ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE: STEVE CARTER Attorney General of Indiana NICOLE M. SCHUSTER Deputy Attorney General Indianapolis, Indiana

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA
RANDAL R. LONG, Appellant-Defendant, vs. STATE OF INDIANA, Appellee-Plaintiff. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

No. 20A03-0606-CR-255

APPEAL FROM THE ELKHART CIRCUIT COURT The Honorable Terry Shewmaker, Judge Cause No. 20C01-0506-FA-101

March 9, 2007 MEMORANDUM DECISION - NOT FOR PUBLICATION DARDEN, Judge

STATEMENT OF THE CASE Randal R. Long appeals his convictions, after a trial by jury, of two counts of dealing in cocaine, as class A felonies. We affirm. ISSUE Whether sufficient evidence supports Long's convictions. FACTS In January of 2005, Confidential Source 91043 ("the CS") was assisting Elkhart County law enforcement's special drug unit in locating drug traffickers. Detective Rose Privett of the Elkhart County Police Department was working "undercover" with the unit and "teamed up" with the CS. (Tr. 110). Based upon the work of this team, on June 13, 2005, the State charged Long with two counts of dealing in cocaine, as class A felonies; specifically, the State alleged that on February 2, 2005, and March 2, 2005, Long had delivered cocaine in amounts weighing three grams or more. Thereafter, at Long's trial on May 8

Download Randal R. Long v. State of Indiana.pdf

Indiana Law