Preview:

Pursuant to Ind.Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collateral estoppel, or the law of the case. APPELLANT PRO SE: RONALD A. WILLIAMS Michigan City, Indiana ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE: STEPHEN R. CARTER Attorney General of Indiana Indianapolis, Indiana MATTHEW D. FISHER Deputy Attorney General Indianapolis, Indiana

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA
RONALD A. WILLIAMS, Appellant-Defendant, vs. STATE OF INDIANA, Appellee-Plaintiff. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

No. 71A05-0610-CR-582

APPEAL FROM THE ST. JOSEPH SUPERIOR COURT The Honorable Jerome Frese, Judge Cause No. 71D01-0204-FA-19

JUNE 20, 2007 MEMORANDUM DECISION - NOT FOR PUBLICATION ROBERTSON, Senior Judge

STATEMENT OF THE CASE Petitioner-Appellant Ronald A. Williams ("Williams") is appealing from the trial court's denial of his motion to correct sentence. ISSUE Williams states the issue as: "The trial Court Judge erred when he refused to grant petitioner his entitled four-hundred (400) days earned credit time served in the county jail. Which is as stated in accordance with and too Indiana Code 35-38-3-2(b)(4)." FACTS Williams was sentenced to fifty years after pleading guilty to an armed robbery charge. When the trial judge sentenced Williams, the judge found that Williams was had been confined for 400 days prior to sentencing. The trial court did not include a

designation of the class of credit. Williams subsequently filed a motion to correct an erroneous sentence, which the trial court denied. Williams contends that he is entitled to have the 400 days increased to 800 days because of good time credit. DISCUSION AND DECISION Ind. Code

Download Ronald A. Williams v. State of Indiana.pdf

Indiana Law