Preview:

Pursuant to Ind.Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collateral estoppel, or the law of the case.

APPELLANT PRO SE: STEVEN K. LIKE Woodway, Texas

ATTORNEY FOR APPELLEE: BROOKS J. GRAINGER Krisor & Associates South Bend, Indiana

FILED
of the supreme court, court of appeals and tax court

Apr 01 2010, 9:00 am

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA
STEVEN K. LIKE, Appellant-Respondent, vs. JANE E. LIKE, Appellee-Petitioner. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

CLERK

No. 71A04-0910-CV-570

APPEAL FROM THE ST. JOSEPH CIRCUIT COURT The Honorable Michael G. Gotsch, Judge The Honorable Larry L. Ambler, Magistrate Cause No. 71C01-9608-DR-598

April 1, 2010 MEMORANDUM DECISION - NOT FOR PUBLICATION

VAIDIK, Judge

Case Summary Steven K. Like ("Father"), pro se, appeals the trial court's denial of his motion to modify his post-secondary educational support obligation for his daughter. Finding that the trial court's order is against the logic and effect of the circumstances before the court, we reverse and remand.1 Facts and Procedural History Father and Jane E. Like ("Mother") dissolved their marriage in 1997. Father and Mother entered into a settlement agreement that was approved by the trial court and incorporated into the dissolution decree. Among other things, the agreement requires Father to pay the college expenses of each of their three children up to the cost of attending Indiana University

Download Steven K. Like v. Jane E. Like.pdf

Indiana Law