Preview:

Pursuant to Ind.Appellate Rule 65(D),  this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collateral estoppel, or the law of the case.






ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT: ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE:

JOSEPH M. CLEARY GREGORY F. ZOELLER
Collignon & Dietrick Attorney General of Indiana  
Indianapolis, Indiana
   ANGELA N. SANCHEZ
   Deputy Attorney General
     Indianapolis, Indiana




IN THE
COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA



TAMEKA CALDWELL, )
)
Appellant-Defendant, )
)
vs. ) No. 49A02-1007-CR-751
)
STATE OF INDIANA, )
)
Appellee-Plaintiff. )



APPEAL FROM THE MARION SUPERIOR COURT
The Honorable Carol J. Orbison, Judge
Cause No. 49G22-0907-FC-64219




May 19, 2011


MEMORANDUM DECISION - NOT FOR PUBLICATION


NAJAM, Judge

STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Tameka Caldwell appeals the sentences imposed after she was convicted of two counts of forgery, as Class C felonies; one count of perjury, as a Class D felony; and two counts of auto theft, as a Class D felony, following a jury trial.  Caldwell presents a single issue for our review, namely, whether her aggregate sentence is inappropriate in light of the nature of the offenses and her character.
We affirm
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY1
1  We observe that the name of appellant

Download 05191103ewn.pdf

Indiana Law