Preview:

  


Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D),  this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, collateral estoppel, or the law of the case.





APPELLANT PRO SE: ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE:

WILLIAM ANDREWS GREGORY F. ZOELLER
Michigan City, Indiana Attorney General of Indiana

   MONIKA PREKOPA TALBOT
   Deputy Attorney General
   Indianapolis, Indiana

    



IN THE
COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA




WILLIAM ANDREWS, )
)
Appellant-Petitioner, )
)
  vs. ) No. 45A03-0812-PC-629
)
STATE OF INDIANA, )
)
Appellee-Respondent. )




APPEAL FROM THE LAKE SUPERIOR COURT
The Honorable Thomas P. Stefaniak, Jr., Judge
The Honorable Natalie Bokota, Magistrate
Cause No. 45G04-0802-PC-03  





August 25, 2009


MEMORANDUM DECISION - NOT FOR PUBLICATION


CRONE, Judge
Case Summary
William Andrews appeals the denial of his petition for post-conviction relief.  We affirm.  
Issues
Andrews raises the following issues for review:
I. Did he receive ineffective assistance of trial counsel?



II. Did he receive ineffective assistance of appellate counsel?



III. Did the post-conviction court abuse its discretion in refusing to subpoena certain witnesses for the post-conviction hearing?  



Facts and Procedural History
The facts as summarized by this Court in Andrews.s direct appeal and adopted by the post-conviction court are as follows:
On May 22, 2001, Andrews and Kenneth Reeves (

Download 08250904tac.pdf

Indiana Law